NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v VORHAUER [2002] NSWCCA 483 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60466/02; 60467/02; 60468/02; 60469/02; 60470/02; 60471/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 November 2002
PARTIES : Regina Florence Amelia and Lisa Amelia VORHAUER JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Sully J at 54; Kirby J at 55
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/31/0438 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Payne DCJ; Kirkham DCJ; Twigg DCJ OFFICER :
Appellants: (Florence) In Person COUNSEL : Crown: PJP Power SC A-G NSW Intervening: R Pepper SOLICITORS : Crown: S E O'Connor A-G NSW Intervening: I V Knight CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Appeals from interlocutory decisions - whether decisions appealed from had requisite degree of finality - where Constitutional issues raised were misconceived - where application for removal of proceedings to High Court and stay of District Court proceedings. Commonwealth Constitution LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) Coco v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427 Plenty v Dillon (1991) 171 CLR 635 CASES CITED: R v Apostilides (1984) 154 CLR 563 R v Glossop [2001] NSWCCA 165 University of Wollongong v Metwally (1984) 158 CLR 447 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60466-60471/02
SPIGELMAN CJ SULLY J KIRBY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate