NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 131 A Crim R 133
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v James Gey-Houn Ra [2002] NSWCCA 251 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60275/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 13/06/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 June 2002
PARTIES : Regina James Gey-Houn Ra JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1;39; O'Keefe J at 2; Simpson J at 38
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Freeman J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr D Dalton - Crown Mr M Allnutt - Applicant S E O'Connor ( Crown) Jack Rigg (Applicant) SOLICITORS :
CATCHWORDS : Sentence appeal - Drug importation - Heroin - More than commercial quantity - Applicant more than mere courier - Not necessary to identify precise nature of applicant's involvement in criminal enterprise - Plea of guilty - Appropriate discount in Commonealth case - Detailed comparison of instant case with another different case unhelpful LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth). Regina v Wong and Leung (1998) 48 NSWLR 340 Queen v Olbrich (1999) 199 CLR 270 CASES CITED: Regina v Wong and Leung (2000) NSWCCA 169 Wong v The Queen; Leung v The Queen (2001) HCA 67; (2001) 76 ALJR 79 R v Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 Siganto v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 656 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted; Appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60275/01
SPIGELMAN CJ O'KEEFE J SIMPSON J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate