NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : The State of New South Wales v Knight [2002] NSWCA 185 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40794/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 21/06/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 July 2002
PARTIES : The State of New South Wales v Luke Aiden Knight JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Handley JA at 2; Ipp AJA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 162/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sidis DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R C Tonner (Appellant) M Cranitch SC/M B Inglis (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Bartier Perry (Appellant) Commins Hendriks (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : LIMITATION OF ACTIONS - extension of time - appeal against grant of extension under s60G Limitation Act 1969 - cause of action to recover damages for injury to shoulder - whether applicant was aware of nature and extent of that injury more than 3 years before applying for extension - 601(1)(a)(ii), 601(1)(b) - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - points not taken below - appeal against grant of extension of time under Limitation Act - argument on appeal but not in court below that delay inordinate and gave rise to actual prejudice. D LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 Itex Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliott [2002] NSWCA 104 CRA Limited v Martignago (1996) 39 NSWLR 13 CASES CITED: Harris v Commercial Minerals (1996) 186 CLR 1 Ditchburn v Seltsam Limited (1989) 17 NSWLR 697 F J Walker Limited v Webber (Unreported, NSWCA, 16 November 1989) Suttor v Gundowda Pty Limited (1950) 81 CLR 418 DECISION : (1) Application for leave to appeal granted (2) Appeal dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate