NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Melbourn v Stephenson [2002] NSWCA 403 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40907/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 9 August 2002, 18 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 December 2002
PARTIES : Clay Corrie Melbourn (Appellant) Lydia May Stephenson (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Stein JA at 15; Brownie AJA at 63
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 8876/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Coleman DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P Hallen SC/ J Young (Appellant) A J Leslie QC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Staunton & Thompson (Appellant) Steve Masselos & Co (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - CAUSATION - balance of probabilities test is not satisfied by evidence that does no more than establish a possibility - effect of death of alleged tortfeasor on plaintiff's ability to recover damages where tort is subsequent to the death of tortfeasor - survival of action in negligence against the estate of the deceased under the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944, s 2(4) - interaction of Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, s 2(4) with the Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, ss 92, 95 where estate fully administered - viability of claim against executor and beneficiaries of the estate - effect of s 95 of the Wills, Probate and Administration Act - whether possibility of an equitable right of action against beneficiaries of the estate arises - ND Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1944, s 2(4) LEGISLATION CITED : Real Property Act 1900 Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898, ss 92, 95 Deputy Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Brown (1958) 100 CLR 32 CASES CITED: Ministry of Health v Simpson [1951] AC 251 Seltsam v McGuiness [2000] 49 NSWLR 262 Taylor v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (1969) 123 CLR 206 DECISION : 1) Appeal allowed with costs, the respondent to have a certificate under the Suitor's Fund Act if otherwise entitled; 2) Set aside his Honour's verdict and orders in favour of the respondent against the appellant and substitute therefor a verdict for the defendant with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate