NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Hoare v SRA of NSW [2002] NSWSC 565 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20967/2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 June 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 June 2002
Peter Hoare (Plaintiff) PARTIES : State Rail Authority of New South Wales (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
COUNSEL : Ms J Merkel (Defendant) Mr P Hoare (Plaintiff in person) SOLICITORS : Bartier Perry (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Summary judgment - extension of limitation period Supreme Court Rules - Part 13 r 5; Part 15 r 26 LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) - s 14(1); s 52 Workers Compensation Act 1987 - s 151D(2) Motor Accident Act - 2 52(4) Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552; [2000] HCA 41 Air Services Australia v Zarb (NSWCA unreported, 26 August 1998) Dey v Victorian Railway Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (1964) 112 CLR 125 Webster & Anor v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 CASES CITED : Salido v Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541; 139 ALR 1 Holt v Wynter [2000] NSWCA 143; (2000) NSWLR 128 Seib v Morton [2000] NSWCA 139, 26 June 2000 McLean v Sydney Water Corporation [2001] NSWCA 122 Parsons v Doukas [2001] NSWCA 128, (2001) 51 NSWLR 162 DECISION : (1) The plaintiff's notice of motion seeking to extend the limitation period is dismissed; (2) The plaintiff's statement of claim is dismissed; (3) The plaintiff is to pay the defendant's costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate