NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 42 ACSR 534 (2002) 20 ACLC 1502
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Goozee v Graphic [2002] NSWSC 640 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2915/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 15/07/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 July 2002
Roger George Goozee - First Plaintiff Mary Rose Goozee - Second Plaintiff Graphic World Group Holdings Pty Limited - First Defendant Ronald Francis Hoolahan - Second Defendant Pyomon Pty Limited - Third Defendant The Bentley Printing Company Pty Limited - Fourth Defendant Keyset Phototype Pty Limited - Fifth Defendant PARTIES : Erolmount Pty Limited - Sixth Defendant Toveheld Pty Limited - Seventh Defendant Double Pay Nominees Pty Limited - Eighth Defendant Jem-K Printing Pty Limited - Ninth Defendant Art Etc Pty Limited - Tenth Defendant Les Baddock Pty Limited - Eleventh Defendant Les Baddock & Sons Pty Limited - Twelfth Defendant The Trade Ruling & Binding Co Pty Limited - Thirteenth Defendant JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
COUNSEL : Mr C R Newlinds - Plaintiffs Mr M D Einfeld QC/Mr A J McInerney - Defendants SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang - Plaintiffs Carneys Lawyers - Defendants CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - oppression and other conduct within s.232 - whether sole shareholder can be "victim" of such conduct - non-payment of dividend by wholly-owned subsidiary to immediate parent - failure of parent to obtain dividend from wholly-owned subsidiary - consolidated retained earnings position does not indicate capacity of any group company to pay dividend - CORPORATIONS - statutory derivative action - s.237 tests discussed - court cannot grant leave unless all tests satisfied - serious question to be tried not shown - collateral purpose indicates lack of good faith - not in best interests of parent that it pursue s.232 claim against subsidiary based on non-payment of dividend LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Corporate Law Economic Reform Program Act 1999 (Cth) Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 76 ALJR 1 Bagot Well Pastoral Co Pty Ltd v Reid (1993) 61 SASR 165 Re D G Brims and Sons Pty Ltd (1995) 16 ACSR 559 Fexuto v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 672 Re G Jeffrey (Mens Store) Pty Ltd (1984) 9 ACLR 193 Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas Ltd [1951] Ch 286 Re H R Harmer Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 62 Industrial Equity Ltd v Blackburn (1977) 137 CLR 564 Jeans v Deangrove Pty Ltd [2001] NSWSC 84 CASES CITED : Maronis Holdings Ltd v Nippon Credit Australia Ltd (2001) 38 ACSR 404 Nicholas v Soundcraft Electronics Ltd [1993] BCLC 360 QBE Insurance Ltd v ASC (1992) 38 FCR 270 RTP Holdings Pty Ltd v Roberts (2000) 36 ACSR 170 Re Sam Weller Ltd [1990] 1 Ch 683 Scottish Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd v Meyer [1959] AC 324 Swansson v Pratt [2002] NSWSC 583 Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1 Wayde v NSW Rugby League Ltd (1985) 180 CLR 459 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 DECISION : Application for leave to commence derivative actions dismissed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate