NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Williams; Regina v Miers [2002] NSWCCA 427 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60065/02; 60049/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 September 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 18 October 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Darren George Williams Regina v Anthony Neville Miers JUDGMENT OF : Buddin J at 57; Smart AJ at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 1/51/0114 1/51/0125 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Ducker DCJ OFFICER :
(A) A P Cook (Williams) COUNSEL : (A) S Kluss (Miers) (C) R Hulme (A) D J Humphreys (Williams) SOLICITORS : (A) James Fuggle (Miers) (C) S E O'Connor CATCHWORDS : Sentencing - parity - extent of reduction which should be made - co-offenders sentences on different factual bases. LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 The Queen v Hoar (1981) 148 CLR R v Cameron [2002] HCA 6 R v Thomson (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Sharma [2002] NSWCCA 142 R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 CASES CITED: Lowe v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR 606 Postiglione v The Queen (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Draper NSWCCA 12 December 1996 R v Diamond NSWCCA 18 February 1993 R v Hopper NSWCCA 19 November 1998 R v Glasby [2000] NSWCCA 83 R v Reid [2000] NSWCCA 166 DECISION : See para 56
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60065/02 60049/02
BUDDIN J SMART AJ
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate