NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Abram v NAB Ltd [2002] NSWSC 116 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20155/2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 February 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 March 2002
Joseph Abram (Plaintiff) PARTIES : National Australia Bank Limited (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Harrison
Joseph Abram (Plaintiff in person) COUNSEL : Mr P M Wood (Defendant) Mr McCarthy, SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Summary judgment - malicious prosecution LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules - Part 15 r 26; Part 13 r 5 Supreme Court Act - -s 88 Air Services Australia v Zarb (NSWCA unreported, 26 August 1998) Dey v Victoria Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62 General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125 CASES CITED : Webster & Anor v Lampard (1993) 177 CLR 598 Associated Securities Finance Ltd v Harrow Properties Pty Limited (NSWSC, 26 May 1977) Little v Law Institute of Victoria (No 3) [1990] VR 257 Mitchell v John Heine & Son Limited (1938) 38 SR(NSW) 466 Grimwade v State of Victoria (1997) ATR 81-422 DECISION : (1) The first defendant's notice of motion filed 27 October 2001 is dismissed; (2) The first defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs as agreed or assessed.
- 9 -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate