NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 131 A Crim R 264
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R .v. TO [2002] NSWCCA 247 revised - 5/09/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60432/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 24 April 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 June 2002
PARTIES : Quoc Vinh TO - Appellant Regina - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Barr J at 2; Greg James J at 63
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0043 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Payne DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr T.A. Game SC with Mr M.J. Johnston for the Appellant Mr G.I.O. Rowling for the Crown SOLICITORS : Legal Aid Commission of NSW for the Appellant S.E.O'Connor for the Crown CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - evidence of indentification parade - whether properly admitted - Criminal law - DNA evidence - whether properly admitted - Criminal law - DNA evidence - whether appropriate database used LEGISLATION CITED : ss 137, 138 & 114(2) Evidence Act 1995 s 55 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Alexander v The Queen (1981) 145 CLR 395 R v Fischer [2001] NSW CCA 380 R v North, Court of Criminal Appeal, New South Wales 4 December 1998 unreported CASES CITED: Festa v The Queen [2001] HCA 72 R v Milat (1996) 87 A Crim R 446 R v Pantoja (1996) 88 A Crim R Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 DECISION : See Judgment at Paragraph 62
IN THE COURT OF REVISED CRIMINAL APPEAL 60432/99
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate