NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 56 NSWLR 164
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Rosenboom & Ors v Qantas Airways Ltd & Ors [2002] NSWSC 792 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20131/01; 20132/01; 20080/01; 20136/01; 20079/01; 20711/00; 20710/00; 20009/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 & 23 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 September 2002
Sonya Rosenboom (P in 20131/01) Mavis Bridge (P in 20132/01) Lyn Massey (P in 20080/01) Matthew Frost (P in 20136/01) Megan McEwan (P in 20079/01) Roystone Pursehouse (P in 20711/00) PARTIES : Regina Woodward (P in 20710/00) Todd Jaques (P in 20009/01) Qantas Airways Limited (D1 in 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20136/01, 20079/01 & 20009/01) Malaysian Airline System Berhad (D2 in 20136/01) PT Garuda Indonesia Limited (D1 in 20711/00) British Airways Plc (D1 in 20710/00) Civil Aviation Safety Authority (D2 in 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20711/00, 20711/00, 20079/01 & 20009/01; D3 in 20136/01) JUDGMENT OF : Sperling J at 1
Mr M McHugh for the Plaintiff in each matter Ms S Brent (solicitor advocate) for the First Defendant in matters 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20136/01, 20079/01 & 20009/01 COUNSEL : Mr G Nell with Ms F Rogers for the Second Defendant in matter 20136/01 Mr M Macrossan for the First Defendant in matter 20711/00 Mr B Shields for the First Defendant in matter 20710/00 Mr S Donaldson SC for the Second Defendant in matters 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20711/00, 20711/00, 20079/01 & 20009/01 and for the Third Defendant in matter 20136/01 Slater & Gordon Pty Ltd Lawyers for the Plaintiff in each matter Minter Ellison Lawyers for the First Defendant in matters 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20136/01, 20079/01 & 20009/01 SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron Lawyers for the Second Defendant in matter 20136/01 Riley Gray-Spencer for the First Defendant in matter 20711/00 Ebsworth & Ebsworth Lawyers for the First Defendant in matter 20710/00 Mallesons Stephen Jaques for the Second Defendant in matters 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20711/00, 20711/00, 20079/01 & 20009/01 and for the Third Defendant in matter 20136/01 CATCHWORDS : Cross-vesting applications - plaintiff's application - principles applicable - scope of legitimate considerations - relevance of prospective savings in private & public cost from pooling of similar cases in the one jurisdiction for joint case management - absence of factors otherwise connecting the cases with the proposed forum LEGISLATION CITED : Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987, s5 Supreme Court Rules 1970, Pt 1 r 12, Pt 74 r 8 Bankinvest AG v Seabrook (1988) 14 NSWLR 711 Dawson v Baker (1994) 120 ACTR 11 James Hardie & Coy Pty Ltd v Barry (2000) 50 NSWLR 357 CASES CITED : Lubbe v Cape Plc [2000] 1 WLR 1545 Production Spray Painting & Panel Beating Pty Ltd & Ors v Newnham & Ors (1991) 27 NSWLR 644 Quinn v Leatham [1901] AC 495 Spiliada Maritime Corporation v Cansulex [1987] AC 460 Wilson v Nattrass [1993] SASC 3945 DECISION : 1. That, in each matter, the proceedings be transferred to the Supreme Court of Victoria; 2. That, in matters 20131/01, 20132/01, 20080/01, 20079/01, 20710/00 and 20009/01, the second defendant only to pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion; 3. In matter 20136/01, the second and third defendants only to pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion; 4. In matter 20711/00, the first and second defendants pay the plaintiff's costs of the notice of motion; 5. Liberty to apply on two days notice within four weeks, for any reconsideration of the orders as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate