NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Wentworth v Graham & 1 Ors [2002] NSWCA 399 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40277/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/09/2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 December 2002
Katherine Wentworth (Applicant) PARTIES : Geoffrey Graham (First Respondent) William Charles Wentworth (Second Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA
COUNSEL : Ms Wentworth (Applicant in person) ex parte SOLICITORS : CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - review of a determination of the Registrar of the Court of Appeal - Registrar decision to dismiss an application for leave to appeal against a decision of an Appeal Judge to not recuse himself on grounds of bias or apprehended bias, LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 s46(1) (2) and (4); s46B(1)(a) Supreme Court Rules Pt 13 r5; Pt 51 r2; Pt 51 r58; Pt 61 rr3 and 4 Bainton v Rajski (1992) 29 NSWLR 539 Barton v Walker [1979] 2 NSWLR 740 Brooks v the Upjohn Company (1998) 156 ALR 622 Chow v DPP (1992) 28 NSWLR 593 Fitzgerald v DPP (1991) 24 NSWLR 45 CASES CITED: Gas & Fuel Corp Superannuation Fund v Saunders (1994) 123 ALR 323; 52 FCR 48 IOOF Aust Trustees Ltd v Seas Sapfor Forests [1999] SASC 249 Kartinyeri v Commonwealth of Australia (1998) 72 ALJR 1334 R v Bow Street Magistrate; ex parte Pinochet Ugarte (No 2) [1999] 1 All ER 577 Rajski v Wood (1989) 18 NSWLR 512 Westpac Banking Corporation v Abemond Pty Ltd (SC(NSW) Santow J, 28 October 1994, unreported) DECISION : Notice of Motion dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate