NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Hutchinson v RTA & Anor [2002] NSWCA 148 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40601 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/04/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 June 2002
Rowan Hutchinson v PARTIES : Roads & Traffic Authority & Government and Related Employees Tribunal JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 14; Stein JA at 15
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT GREAT 310 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT P A Lynch JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : A: Mr Game SC & Mr Howell R: Mr Fernon A: Lawrence N Dunn SOLICITORS : R1: Henry Davis York R2: I V Knight Crown Solicitor CATCHWORDS : Application for prerogative relief - employment dismissal - alleged breach of Code of Conduct - harassment - whether the Second Tribunal used the First Tribunal's reasons as a template - summons dismissed with costs. DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40601 of 2001 GREAT 310 of 1998
MEAGHER JA HANDLEY JA STEIN JA
Monday, June 24 2002 ROWAN HUTCHINSON v ROADS & TRAFFIC AUTHORITY & 1 Or FACTS
The appellant, Mr Hutchinson, was summarily dismissed from his employment with the RTA, the respondent, for an alleged breach of the RTA's Code of Conduct. Mr Hutchinson appealed to the Government and Related Employees Appeal Tribunal (the First Tribunal), which dismissed his appeal. The appellant then successfully sought relief in this Court, and the First Tribunal's decision was quashed on the ground of the apprehended bias of its Chairman. The Court directed a rehearing. The rehearing (the Second Tribunal), conducted by a differently constituted tribunal, also dismissed Mr Hutchinson's appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate