NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2003) NSW ConvR 56-048
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Tanwar v Cauchi [2002] NSWCA 35 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40610/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 February 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 March 2002
Tanwar Enterprises Pty Limited PARTIES : v Joseph Cauchi & Ors JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Beazley JA at 39; Mathews AJA at 40
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT ED 3321/01; ED 4891/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Windeyer J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - D E Grieve QC/B Slowgrove Respondent - I M Wales SC SOLICITORS : Appellant - Alexander Lee & Associates Blacktown Respondent - Low Doherty & Stratford Blacktown CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - rescission - forfeiture - unconscionable conduct - exceptional circumstances LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 Stern v McArthur (1988) 165 CLR 489 CASES CITED: Steedman v Drinkle [1916] 1 AC 275 Kilmer v British Columbia Orchard Lands Ltd [1913] AC 319 Union Eagle Ltd v Golden Achievement Ltd [1997] AC 514 Ciavarella v Balmer (1983) 153 CLR 438 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40610/01 ED 3321/01 ED 4891/00 HANDLEY JA BEAZLEY JA MATHEWS AJA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate