NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : CURETON v BLACKSHAW SERVICES PTY LTD AND ORS [2002] NSWCA 187 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40575/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 May 2002 23 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 June 2002
William H Cureton - Appellant Blackshaw Services Pty Ltd - First Respondent PARTIES : Jack Hicks - Second Respondent Hinemoa Pty Ltd - Third Respondent Hicks Holdings Pty Ltd - Fourth Respondent Hinemoa (Properties) Pty Ltd - Fifth Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Sheller JA at 2; Beazley JA at 120
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT 3750/92 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Palmer J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : C J Birch SC/A F Fernon - Appellant M J Slattery QC/R D Marshall - Respondents SOLICITORS : Grahame W Howe & Co - Appellant Henshaws - Respondents CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - cross-examination - trial Judge's refusal to allow further cross-examination on credit - incriminate witness - credit findings - Evidence Act 1995, s128 - INTEREST - compound interest - quarterly rests - Supreme Court Rules 1970, Schedule J - commercial rates of interest Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules 1970 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Air Great Lakes Pty Ltd v K S Easter (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 309 Alemite Lubrequip Pty Ltd v Adams (1997) 41 NSWLR 45 Attorney-General v Alford 4 De G M & G 843; (1855) 43 ER 737 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Burdick v Garrick (1870) 5 LR Ch App 233 Devries v Australian National Railways Commission (1993) 177 CLR 472 Hungerfords v Walker (1989) 171 CLR 125 CASES CITED: Jervis v Berridge (1873) LR 8 Ch App 351 Jones v Foxall (1852) 15 Beav 388; (1851) 51 ER 588 O'Sullivan v Management Agency Music Limited [1985] QB 428 Re Tennant Mortlock v Hawker (1942) 65 CLR 473 Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 75 ALJR 734 Southern Cross Commodities Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) v Ewing (1987) 11 ALR 818 Vyse v Foster (1842) 8 Ch App 309; (1874) LR 7 HL 318 Wallersteiner v Moir (No 2) [1975] QB 373 Warman International Ltd v Dwyer (1995) 182 CLR 544 DECISION : 1 The appellant to file and serve on or before 5 July 2002 proposed short minutes of order to reflect these reasons for judgment; 2 If the appellant's short minutes are not agreed the respondent to file and serve on or before 10 July 2002 short minutes of order to reflect the reasons for judgment; 3 The appeal stood over for mention before Sheller JA at 9.30 am on Friday, 12 July 2002 for the making of orders disposing of the appeal; 4 Liberty to the parties to apply in Chambers if agreement on the short minutes is reached before 12 July 2002.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate