NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : United Rural Enterprises v Lopmand [2002] NSWSC 1178 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4039/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 25/11/02-29/11/02, 2/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 December 2002
United Rural Enterprises Pty Limited (Plaintiff) PARTIES : Lopmand Pty Limited (First Defendant) Tracey John Lake (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
COUNSEL : M Cashion SC; J White (Plaintiff) B DeBuse (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Kemp Strang (Plaintiff) McCooe Raves & Poole (Defendants) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - factual findings re terms of particular contract - findings re construction of particular contract - factual findings relevant to whether rectification of contract should be granted - no question of principle - CONTRACTS - discharge and breach - difference between termination of contract following repudiation, and rescission of contract in equity - CORPORATIONS - oppression - whether oppression arises from corporation A becoming registered as holder of cross-claimant's share and in consequence excluding cross-claimant from participation in affairs of corporation, when corporation B entitled to become registered as holder of cross-claimant's share and exclude cross-claimant from participation in affairs of corporation - MORTGAGES - mortgage over share by deposit of share certificate - rights of mortgagee to enforce security - rights of mortgagee to receive reports and notices of meeting, and to vote - CORPORATIONS - right to receive reports and notices, and to vote, when share subject to mortgage by deposit of share certificate and mortgagee becomes registered - CORPORATIONS - order for inspection of records - rectification of register LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Supreme Court Act 1970 Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337 Deverges v Sandemen Clark & Co [1902] 1 Ch 579 Ghana Commercial Bank & Chandiram [1960] AC 732 Harold v Plenty [1901] 2 Ch 314 Heyman v Darwins Ltd [1942] AC 356 CASES CITED : Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation [1921] 3 KB 110 McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457 Moschi v Lep Air Services Ltd [1973] AC 331 Musselwhite v C H Musselwhite & Son Ltd [1962] 1 Ch 964 Pukallus v Cameron (1982) 180 CLR 447 Siemens & Co Ltd v Burns [1918] 2 Ch 324 Stubbs v Slater [1910] 1 Ch 632 DECISION : Parties to bring in short minutes
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate