NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 133 A Crim R 352
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v RCC [2002] NSWCCA 347 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60838/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 6 February 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 September 2002
Regina PARTIES : v RCC JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Sully J at 2; Dowd J at 15
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/31/0259 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Kirkham DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : DML Woodburne - Crown AP Cook - Appellant SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor - Crown DJ Humphreys - Appellant CATCHWORDS : Inconsistent verdicts - absence of obvious reason for jury to convict on one and not other counts - danger of compromise and wrongful conviction. Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1906 (W.A.) M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 R v RAT [2000] 111 A Crim R 360 R v Carbone [2000] NSWCCA 387 CASES CITED: R v Dixon [2001]NSWCCA 39 R v S [2001] NSWCCA 204 R v Markuleski [2001] NSWCCA 290 MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 11 Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 DECISION : (1) The first ground of appeal upheld (2) Appeal allowed (3) Conviction of the appellant upon ground 6 of the indictment be quashed and entered in lieu judgment of acquittal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate