NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Borody v Smith & Ors [2002] NSWSC 1242 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12007 of 2002 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 December 2002
Thomas Julius Borody (Plaintiff) v PARTIES : Jack Smith (Police Informant) (First Defendant) Poltech International Limited (Second Defendant) The Roads and Traffic Authority (Third Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Master Malpass
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT Z3094 685/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Mr G Still, LCM JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Mr M Buscombe (Plaintiff) COUNSEL : Mr S J Odgers SC (First and Third Defendants) Mr P J D Hamill (Second Defendant) D'Angelo Solicitors (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt (First and Third Defendants) Robertson Saxton Primrose Dunn (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Appeal from interlocutory order - magistrate sets aside subpoenas - subpoenas inter alia too wide - lack of legitimate forensic purpose - reluctance to intervene on matters of practice and procedure. Justices Act 1902, s 104 (4). LEGISLATION CITED : National Measurement Act 1960, s 10. Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) Act 1999, ss 44 - 47. NSW Commissioner of Police v Tuxford & Ors [2002] NSWCA 139. CASES CITED : R v Saleam (1989) 16 NSWLR 14. Regina v James Saleam [1999] NSWCCA 86. DECISION : See Paragraph 27.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate