NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Sealark P/L v Shoalhaven City Council [2002] NSWCA 39 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40680 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : 30/11/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 February 2002
Sealark Pty Limited PARTIES : v Shoalhaven City Council JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Foster AJA at 18; Ipp AJA at 43
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Land & Environment Court LOWER COURT LEC 10769 of 1999 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Bignold J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : A: J Rares SC with J Robson R: J Webster SOLICITORS : A: Blake Dawson Waldron R: Morton & Harris CATCHWORDS : Development application - approval sought for subdivision of land - whether council had power to grant application - appeal dismissed. DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
- 4 -IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40680 of 2000 LEC 10769 of 1999 MEAGHER JA IPP JA FOSTER AJA Thursday, 28 February 2002 SEALARK PTY LIMITED v SHOALHAVEN CITY COUNCIL
Facts
The appellant lodged a development application with Shoalhaven City Council proposing the excision of five concessional allotments out of two holdings. The Council refused the application on the basis that it had no power to grant such a subdivision. At trial, the Council's decision was affirmed. In this appeal, the appellant contended that Council did not relevantly lack power and because of the decision reached by both the trial judge and Council, it had been denied consideration of its application on the merits.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate