NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Petroulias v Wills [2002] NSWSC 1190 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 12242/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 3 - 4 December 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 December 2002
PARTIES : Nikytas Nicholas Petroulias - Applicant Gary Andrew Wills - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Simpson J
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 10441/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Sweeney LCM JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R Richter QC with N Clelland - Applicant PS Hastings QC with CP Hoy - Respondent SOLICITORS : W Coady - Applicant Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions - Respondent CATCHWORDS : appeal against order for committal for trial - s104(3) Justices Act 1902 - charge of defrauding the Commonwealth - s29D Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - charge of unauthorised disclosure - s70 Crimes Act - charge of corruption as a Commonwealth officer s73(2) Crimes Act - Part IVAA Taxation Administration Act Private Rulings - need to prove "imperilment" to interest of Commonwealth Justices Act 1902 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) LEGISLATION CITED : Taxation Administration Act 1953 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 Fringe Benefits Tax Assessment Act 1986 Peters v The Queen [1998] HCA 7; 192 CLR 493 The Queen v Kastratovic (1985-96) 42 SASR 59 CASES CITED : State Rail Authority of NSW v Smith [2000] NSW SC 334, unreported, 19 April 2000 Lamb v Moss; Yates v Wilson (1989) 168 CLR 338; Castles v Briot (1989) 19 ALD 153 Basha v R (1989) 39 A Crim R 337 DECISION : Leave to appeal granted, parties to be heard on what orders should be made as a result.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate