NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Holbrook v Beresford [2003] NSWCA 15 HEARING DATE(S) : 16/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 12 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Stein JA at 18; Santow JA at 19 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Order of verdict below set aside; 3. In lieu of orders below order that the defendant pay the plaintiff the sum of $342,581.98; 4. Order for the defendant to pay the costs below and of the appeal.
CATCHWORDS : Damages - s.79A Motor Accidents Act 1988 - application of test in s.79A. LEGISLATION CITED : s.79A Motor Accidents Act 1988 PARTIES : Lee Holbrook (nee Fulton) v Garth Beresford FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40849 of 2001 COUNSEL : A: Dr A Morrison SC & D Russell R: Mr J D Hislop QC & G Bellew SOLICITORS : A: Fraser Clancy Lawyers R: Blake Dawson Waldron
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 7486 of 1999 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Gamble ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40849 of 2001
MEAGHER JA STEIN JA SANTOW JA
Wednesday, 12 February 2002 LEE HOLBROOK (nee FULTON) v GARTH BERESFORD
FACTS
The appellant (the plaintiff below) was injured in a motorcar accident when passenger in a vehicle driven carelessly by the respondent. In the District Court, the appellant claimed damages in the region of $507,849.00. Judgment was entered in her favour, for the lesser sum of $148,246.68, whereupon she appealed to the Court of Appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate