NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Optus v Leighton & Ors [2002] NSWSC 327 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division Construction List FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 55059/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/2/01-15/02/01; 20/02/01-22/02/01; 26/02/01-28/02/01; 5/03/01-8/03/01; 12/03/01-15/03/01; 19/03/01-22/03/01; 29/03/01; 2/04/01- 5/01/01; 9/04/01; 10/04/01; 23/04/01; 24/01/01; 30/04/01; 1/05/01; 14/05/01; 15/05/01; 28/05/01-31/05/01; 4/06/01-7/06/01; 12/06/01-14/06/01; 18/06/01-21/06/01; 25/06/01-28/06/01; 2/07/01-6/07/01; 6/07/01-12/07/01; 16/07/01; 17/07/01; 20/07/01; 23/07/01; 27/07/01; 30/07/01-1/08/01; 13/08/01; 19/10/01; 22/10/01-25/10/01 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2002
First Plaintiff: Optus Networks Pty Limited Second Plaintiff: Optus Systems Pty Limited Fourth Plaintiff: Optus Vision Pty Limited Fifth Plaintiff: Optus Communications Pty Limited PARTIES : First Defendant: Leighton Contractors Pty Limited Second Defendant: Norman Disney & Young & Partners Pty Limited Third Defendant: Tyco Australia Pty Limited Sixth Cross-claimant: EMAE Pty Limited Fifth Cross-claimant: The WorkCover Authority of New South Wales JUDGMENT OF : Hunter J
Plaintiffs: P Greenwood SC; P Durack; S Climpson First Defendant: P Garling SC; R Pepper COUNSEL : Second Defendant: S Robb QC; G Ellis Third Defendant: N Hutley SC; J Lockhart Sixth Cross-claimant: G Downes QC; N Kidd Fifth Cross-claimant: S Donaldson SC Plaintiffs: Minter Ellison Lawyers First Defendant: Moray & Agnew SOLICITORS : Second Defendant: Colin Biggers & Paisley Third Defendant: Blake Dawson Waldron Sixth Cross-claimant: Allen Allen &Hemsley Fifth Cross-claimant: Phillips Fox CATCHWORDS : Contract - negligent performance of contract for fire suppressant system - accidental discharge of foreign matter from system - contamination of computer bank - liability of principal contractor - of subcontractors - professional negligence - liability of statutory authority in system testing - misleading conduct - negligent misrepresentation in certification of works - contributory negligence of principal - Damages - whether property damage or econmic loss - principles applicable - whether principle of betterment part of assessment of damages - whether benefits to principal in rectification work to be taken into account - onus of proof where issue of betterment raised - whether costs of rectification incremental - statutory contribution - contractual indemnity - liability in contribution of insolvent subcontractor - principles of apportionment. Boiler and Pressure Vessel Regulations 1942 (NSW) Factories, Shops And Industries Act 1962 (NSW) Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1946 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1965 (NSW) Occupational Health and Safety Act 1983 (NSW) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) WorkCover Administration Act 1989 (NSW) Astley v Austrust Ltd (1999) 197 CLR 1 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Company v Underground Electric Railways Company of London [1912] AC 673 Bryan v Maloney (1994 - 1995) 182 CLR 609 Bulk Materials (Coal handling) Pty Ltd v Compressed Air & Packaging Systems (NSW) Pty Ltd (1997) 14 BCL 109 Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520 Carslogie Steamship Co Ltd v Royal Norweigian Government [1952] AC 292 Cashfield House Ltd v David & Heather Sinclair Ltd [1995] 1 NZLR 452 Chaplin v Hicks[1911] 2 KB 786 Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizens Co-operative Assurance Co. of Australia Ltd (1931) 46 CLR 41 Crimmins v Stevedoring Indurstry Finance Committee (1999 - 2000) 200 CLR 1 Daniels v Anderson [1995] 37 NSWLR 438 Fisher v C.H.T. Ltd (No. 2) [1966] 2 QB 475 Frankcom v Woods (NSWCA 1 October 1980 (unreported)) Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341 Haines v Bendall (1991) 172 CLR 60 Harbutt's "Plasticine" Ltd v Wayne Tank and Pump Co. Ltd [1970] 1 QB 447 Hawkins v Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539 Hill v Van Erp (1996 - 1997) 188 CLR 159 Hoad v Scone Motors Pty Ltd [1977] 1 NSWLR 88 Hodge and Another v Clifford Cowling & Co [1990] 46 EG 120 Hollis v Vabu Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44 (9 August 2001) Hussey v Eels [1990] 2 QB 227 Hyder Consulting (Australia) Pty Ltd v Wilh Wilhelmsen Agency Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 313 IT walker Holdings Ltd v Tuf Shoes Ltd [1981] 2 NZLR 391 CASES CITED : J & B Caldwell Ltd v Logan House Retirement Home Ltd [1999] 2 NZLR 99 Johns v Prunell [1960] VR 208 Johnson v Perez (1988 - 1989) 166 CLR 351 Joyner v Weeks [1891] 2 QB 31 Lavarack v Woods of Colchester [1967] 1 QB 278 Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pty Ltd v Anzil (2000) 176 ALR 411 Monroe Schneider Associates Inc v No1 Raberem Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 1 Murphy v Brown [1985] 1 NSWLR 131 Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris 1996 - 1997) 188 CLR 313 NRMA Ltd v Morgan (1999) 31 ACSR 435 Pacific Associates Inc v Baxter [1990] 1 QB 993 Peake v Steriline Manufacturing Pty Limited (1988) Aust Torts Reports 80-154Performance Cars Ltd v Abraham [1962] 1 QB 33 Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1991) 198 CLR 180 Pyrenees Shire Council v Day (1998) 192 CLR 330 Romeo v Conservation Commission (NT) (1998) 192 CLR 431 RW Miller & Co Pty Limited v Krupp (Australia) Pty Limited (1995) 11 BCL 74 Sea Containers Ltd v ICT Pty Ltd [1998] NSWSC 474 Simonious Vischer & Co v Holt Thompson [1979] 2 NSWLR 322 Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424 Taylor v Rover Co. Ltd [1966] 2 All ER 181 Tepko v Water Board [2001] HCA 19 (5 April 2001) The Habersham Grange [1905] P 307 Theiss Watkins White Construction Limited v The Commonwealth (1992) 14 BCL 61 Voli v Inglewood Shire Council (1962 - 1963) 110 CLR 74 Watts v Rake (1962) 108 CLR 158 DECISION : Judgment for first, second and fourth plaintiffs against first and third defendants - otherwise proceedings dismissed: judgment for cross-claimant under third cross-claim against second cross-defendant - otherwise cross-claims dismissed - save for seventh cross-claim. Final orders as to the seventh cross-claim, quantum and costs deferred pending presentation of short minutes by parties at time of publication of reasons.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate