NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Cafest v Tombleson [2003] NSWCA 210 HEARING DATE(S) : 11/06/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 August 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Sheller JA at 20; Ipp JA at 21 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Judgment and verdict below set aside; 3. In lieu thereof, verdict for the defendant (appellant); 4. Order the respondent to pay the appellant's costs of trial and of the appeal, but to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act 1951.
CATCHWORDS : NEGLIGENCE - Reasonableness - Want of reasonable care. Agar v Hyde (2000) 201 CLR 552 CASES CITED : Woods v Multisport Holdings Ltd (2002) 76 ALJR 483 Tame v New South Wales (2002) 76 ALJR 1348 Cafest Holdings Pty Limited t/as Skateplus PARTIES : v Julianne Tombleson FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40544 of 2002 COUNSEL : A: C R R Hoeben SC & M R Heath R: G Miller QC & Colin Cook SOLICITORS : A: Colin Biggers & Paisley R: Lyons & Lyons
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 1634 of 2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Robison DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40544 OF 2002
MEAGHER JA SHELLER JA IPP JA
Friday, 1 August 2003 CAFEST HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED T/AS SKATEPLUS v JULIANNE TOMBLESON
FACTS The respondent (the plaintiff below) had fallen over and broken her right wrist while skating in the appellant's (defendant's) roller-skating rink. She was an active sportswoman, but had no previous experience of roller-skating.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate