NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Bowman & Anor [2002] NSWCCA 449 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60428/02; 60427/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 November 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 November 2002
Regina PARTIES : Bradley Russell Bowman Paul Nathan Bowman JUDGMENT OF : Dunford J at 1; Sperling J at 1; Carruthers AJ at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 00/11/0970 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Keleman DCJ OFFICER :
Mr I McClintock SC for the Applicant PN Bowman COUNSEL : Mr M Thangaraj for the Applicant BR Bowman Mr D Frearson for the Crown Galloways for the Applicant PN Bowman SOLICITORS : Michael Croke & Co for the Applicant BR Bowman SE O'Connor for the Director of Public Prosecutions CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - application for leave to appeal against an interlocutory order - trial judge refused an application for a permanent stay - whether necessary for prosecution to believe accused guilty of offence charged where legislation deems offence on a lesser proof - no other question of principle LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s5F Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s3, s10, s24, s25, s29 BD (2001) 122 A Crim R 28 CASES CITED: Kellert (1961) 80 WN (NSW) 307 Mitchell v John Heine & Son Ltd (1938) SR (NSW) 466 Williams v Spautz (1992) 174 CLR 509 DECISION : See paragraph 1 of the judgment.
- 7 -IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60428/02 60427/02
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate