NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 47 ACSR 681
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Veremu Pty Ltd & Ors v Ezishop.Net Ltd & Ors [2003] NSWCA 317 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 October 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Giles JA at 2; Santow J at 24 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Share subscriber agreement - venture capital company - company on brink of insolvency - agreement to subscribe for shares in the future by a funding programme - failed to subscribe - company went into liquidation - company in liquidation sued for subscription amounts - able and willing to issue shares - whether agreement frustrated - whether performance radically changed - whether common assumption that company would continue trading - ceasing trading and liquidation in contemplation, subscribers took the risk, and the agreement covered the situation - no frustration. Baltic Shipping Co v Dillon (1993) 176 CLR 344; CASES CITED : Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337; Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council (1956) AC 696; Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall (2001) 208 CLR 516. Veremu Pty Ltd - First Appellant CBM Mining Pty Ltd - Second Appellant Galnom (No 1) Pty Ltd - Third Appellant Jam Family Investments Pty Ltd - Fourth Appellant Michael Gidman Hand - Fifth Appellant PARTIES : Charles Brian Marheine - Sixth Appellant Tim Efkarpidis - Seventh Appellant Malcolm Donald Coleman - Eighth Appellant Ezishop.Net Ltd - First Respondent Anthony Milton Sims - Second Respondent Scott Darren Pacoe - Third Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40245/03 COUNSEL : B W Walker SC & R J Powell SC -Appellants B A Coles QC & R K Newton - Respondents SOLICITORS : Bowring Stone Lawyers - Appellants Purcell Insolvency Lawyers - Respondents
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate