NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) Aust Contract Reports 90-155
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Brooks v NSW Grains Board & Ors [2002] NSWSC 1049 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2916/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 to 20, 23 and 24 September, 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 November 2002
Ray Brooks Pty Ltd - Plaintiff PARTIES : NSW Grains Board (Subject to Scheme of Arrangement) - First Defendant Grainco Australia Limited - Second Defendant Martrat Pty Ltd (t/a Huxley Hill & Assoc) - Third Defendant (Submitting Appearance) JUDGMENT OF : Palmer J
N.C. Hutley SC, M.G. McHugh - Plaintiff COUNSEL : R.G. Forster SC, D.R. Pritchard - First Defendant P.M. Biscoe QC, J. Kirk - Second Defendant N/A (Submitting appearance) - Third Defendant Withnell Hetherington - Plaintiff SOLICITORS : Henry Davis York - First Defendant Corrs Chambers Westgarth - Second Defendant Bartier Perry - Third Defendant - Submitting Appearance CATCHWORDS : CONTRACT - CONSTRUCTION - EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE - PAROLE EVIDENCE RULE - Conflict in the authorities as to when extrinsic evidence admissible to construe a contract - whether there is inconsistency between the decision of the House of Lords in Investors Compensation Scheme v West Bromwich Building Society and the decision of the High Court in Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority as to the admission of extrinsic evidence - Codelfa discussed and explained. STANDARD FORM CONTRACT - Whether extrinsic evidence inadmissible as a matter of principle as an aid to construction of standard form contract. GRAIN MARKETING ACT - Authorised Buyer Agreement - whether agreement on true construction confers authority to buy malting variety barley - construction of s.40 of Act - power of Board to authorise purchase of grades or descriptions of a "commodity" - definition of "malting barley". LEGISLATION CITED : Grain Marketing Act, 1991 (NSW) - s.3(1), s.31, s.32, s.33, s.40, s.45, s.46, s.87 - Benjamin Developments Ltd v Robt Jones (Pacific) Ltd [1994] 3 NZLR 189 - Boat Park Ltd v Hutchinson [1999] 2 NZLR 74 - Charter Reinsurance Co Ltd v Fagan [1997] AC 313 - Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority (NSW) (1982) 149 CLR 377 - Philip Collins Ltd v Davis [2000] 3 All ER 808 - Contact Energy Ltd v Natural Gas Corp of NZ Ltd [2000] NZCA 132 - Great Western Railway and Midland Railway v Bristol Corporation (1918) 87 LJ Ch 414 - Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd v West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 WLR 896 - Don King Productions Ltd v Warren [1998] 2 Ll R 176 - McCann v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd (2000) 203 CLR 579 CASES CITED : - Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749 - NDA Engineering Ltd v Oxford Group Ltd [1999] NZCA 270 - Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 WLR 1381 - Pyne Gould Guinness Ltd v Montgomery Watson (NZ) Ltd [1999] NZCA 266 - Rankin v Scott Fell & Co (1904) 2 CLR 164 - Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Hansen-Tangen (The Diana Prosperity) [1976] 1 WLR 989 - Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council (2002) 76 ALJR 436 - Secured Income Real Estate (Australia) Ltd v St Martins Investments Pty Ltd (1979) 144 CLR 596 - Sinochem International Oil (London) Co Ltd v Mobil Sales and Supply Corp [2000] 1 Ll R 339 - Towne v Eisner (1918) 245 US 418 - Valentines Properties Ltd v Huntco Corp Ltd [2000] 3 NZLR 16 - Wilson v Anderson (2002) 190 ALR 313 DECISION : Plaintiff not entitled to relief sought.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate