NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 147 A Crim R 450
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Parkes [2003] NSWCCA 12 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 February 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 1; Hulme J at 133; Bell J at 141 DECISION : (1) Appeal against convictions dismissed (2) Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - evidence - claim of right - whether judge erred in striking out as irrelevant part of Crown witness' testimony favourable to defendant's claim - whether judge erred in not allowing defendant to cross-examine on evidence that was struck out - EVIDENCE - hearsay - whether evidence admissible at common law as a prior consistent statement - whether admissible under s 65 or s 66 of the Evidence Act 1995 - where evidence admissible under s 66 of the Evidence Act - where evidence not significant - whether exclusion gave rise to a miscarriage of justice - EVIDENCE ACT - whether trial judge erred in making appellant aware in the presence of a jury the effects of s 128 of the Act - whether trial judge contravened s 132 of the Act - CRIMINAL TRIAL - forensic tactics - where Crown used s 38 of the Evidence Act as a forensic device - whether unfair or improper advantage - whether abuse of section - whether judge's failure to refer to s 192 of the Evidence Act an error of law - where Crown case is strong - whether cumulative effect of errors result in a lost chance of defendant being acquitted - Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 6(1) - appeal dismissed. Corporations Law, s 596(b) LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, ss 38, 65, 66, 128, 132, 192(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(1) Glennon v The Queen (1994) 179 CLR 1 Graham v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 606 Mraz (1955) 93 CLR 493 Nominal Defendant v Clements (1960) 104 CLR 476 R v Esho [2001] NSWCCA 415 R v Fowler [2000] NSWCCA 142 R v Hogan [2001] NSWCCA 292 CASES CITED : R v Kingswell (unreported, NSWCCA, 2 September 1998) R v Mansour (unreported, NSWSC, 19 November 1996) R v Milat (unreported, NSWSC, 23 April 1996) R v Pantoja (unreported, NSWCCA, 5 November 1998) R v Nguyen [2002] NSWSC 59 R v Reardon [2002] NSWCCA 203 R v Van Le [2002] NSWCCA 186 Stanoevski v The Queen (2001) 202 CLR 115 PARTIES : Regina v Damien Parkes FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60506/01 COUNSEL : B T Stratton QC (Appellant) R Sutherland SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Ross Hill & Associates (Appellant) Commonwealth DPP (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate