NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 41 ACSR 491 (2002) 20 ACLC 1695
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Quitstar v Cooline [2002] NSWSC 402 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 1886/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/05/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 May 2002
PARTIES : Quitstar Pty Limited - Appellant Cooline Pacific Pty Limited - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Barrett J
LOWER COURT Supreme Court (Master) JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 1886/02 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Master Macready JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr D. Knaggs, Solicitor - Appellant Mr B.J. Burke - Respondent SOLICITORS : Douglas Knaggs - Appellant MacPherson & Kelly - Respondent CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS - winding up - statutory demand - whether specification of creditor's address as post office box is a defect - whether demand in prescribed form but referring to "Corporations Law" instead of "Corporations Act 2001" is a "statutory demand" - whether misdescription of legislation is a defect LEGISLATION CITED : Acts Interpretation Act 1901 Corporations Law 2001 Kalamunda Meat Wholesalers Pty Ltd v Reg Russell & Sons Pty Ltd (1994) 13 ACSR 525 Sarikaya v Victorian Workcover Authority (1997) 80 FCR 262 CASES CITED : Spencer Constructions Pty Ltd v G & M Aldridge Pty Ltd (1997) 76 FCR 452 Topfelt Pty Ltd v State Bank of New South Wales Ltd (1993) 47 FCR 226 Vicbar Pty Ltd v Development Constructions (Newcastle) Pty Ltd (1995) 13 ACLC 1220 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate