NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Schenker International (Australia) & Anor v Siemens Ltd [2002] NSWCA 172 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40760 of 2001 HEARING DATE(S) : 18/04/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 2002
Schenker International (Australia) Pty Ltd and PARTIES : Schenker International Deutschland GMBH v Siemens Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Sheller JA at 13; Stein JA at 40
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT SC 50152 of 1998 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Barrett J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant: A Meagher SC & R Darke SC Respondent: C Needham SC & J Roberts SOLICITORS : Appellant: Blake Dawson Waldron Respondent: O'Reilly Sever & Co CATCHWORDS : Section 11 Civil Aviation (Carriers Liability) Act 1959 - damage to goods - whether Chapter 3 Articles 18 and 22 applied - whether Clause 4 of the House Airway Bill operated to limit the carrier's liability for negligence - appeal allowed. Civil Aviation (Carriers Liability) Act 1959 LEGISLATION CITED : Warsaw Convention at the Hague 28 September 1955 Customs Act 1901 Carriage of Goods by Road Act 1965 (UK) Victoria Sales Corporation v Emery Air Freight Inc 917 F2d 705 (2nd Circulation 1990) Quantum Corporation Ltd v Plane Trucking Ltd [2001] 2 LloydsLR 133 Aerofloral Inc v Rodricargo Express Corporation 756 So 2R 234 (2000) CASES CITED: Read-rite Corporation v Burlington Air Express Ltd 186 F 3d 1190 (1999) Adler v Dickson [1955] 1 Qb 158 Port Jackson Stevedoring Pty Limited v Salmond & Spraggon (Australia) Pty Limited (1980) 144 CLR 300 Samuel Montagu & Co v Swiss Air Transport Co Ltd [1966] 1 Lloyd's Rep 323 at 326 Read-rite Corporation & American Homes Assurance Company v Burlington Air Express Ltd (1998) US Dist LEXIS 21523, Cl 4 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Judgment given by Barrett J in favour of the Respondent on 31 August 2001 be set aside and in lieu thereof there be judgment for the Respondent in the sum of US$74,680.00 plus interest from 23 July 1997 to 31 August 2001; 3. That the issues relating to the applicable rates of interest on both the pre and post judgment amounts be remitted to the trial judge for determination; 4. That the issue of costs in the proceedings in the Court below be remitted to the trial Judge for determination; 5. That the issue of costs of appeal be determined by further application to this Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate