NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Murdocca v Murdocca (No2) [2002] NSWSC 505 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 3726/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 June 2002
PARTIES : Cosimo Murdocca (Plaintiff) Antonio Murdocca (Second Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
COUNSEL : C Harris (Plaintiff) D Marks (Second Defendant) SOLICITORS : Business Law Office (Plaintiff) Roderick B Harris & Co (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY - general principles and maxims of equity - interest payable when late performance of equitable personal obligation - effect on payment of interest of payee's conduct causing the delay in performance of equitable personal obligation - appropriate rate of interest - SUCCESSION - EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS - proceedings to enforce transfer of specific devise of land - construction of will needed to decide plaintiff's entitlement to the devise - whether costs of proceedings are testamentary expenses - principles in accord with which costs of litigation concerning deceased estates are awarded - how those principle interact with rules for order of application of assets in administration of estates - present status of practice established by Patching v Barnett [1907] 2 Ch 154 - present status of approach to costs based on Roberts v Graham (1917) 17 SR (NSW) 676 - PROCEDURE - costs - litigation concerning construction of will Equity Act 1901 Government of Ireland Act 1920 (UK) LEGISLATION CITED : Land Transfer Act 1897 (UK) Supreme Court Act 1970 Trustee Act 1925 Wills, Probate and Administration Act 1898 Adam v Mullen, Holland J, Supreme Court of NSW, 15 December 1976, unreported Allen v Attorney General (1914) 15 SR (NSW) 41 Attorney General for New South Wales v Metcalfe (1904) 1 CLR 421 Ballard v Shutt (1880) 15 Ch D 122 Davies v Littlejohn (1923) 34 CLR 174 Fowler v Nield (1961) SR (NSW) 152 Hagan v Waterhouse (1994) 34 NSWLR 308 Hermann v Charny [1976] 1 NSWLR 261 Higstrim v Ray (1895) 16 NSWLR (Eq) 1 Hungerfords v Walker (1989) 171 CLR 125 In Re Betts; Doughty v Walker [1907] 2 Ch 149 In Re Buckton; Buckton v Buckton [1907] 2 Ch 406 In Re Cunningham; Sprowle v Quested (1914) 31 WN (NSW) 44 In Re Drax; Savile v Drax [1903] 1 Ch 781 In Re Groom [1897] 2 Ch 407 In Re Hall-Dare; Le Marchant v Lee Warner [1916] 1 Ch 272 In Re Jones; Elgood v Kinderley [1902] 1 Ch 92 In Re Stone; Read v Dubua (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 508 CASES CITED : In Re White; White v White (1910) 10 SR (NSW) 304 Lawrence v Broderick (1974) 1 BPR 9115 Lloyd v Frape (1922) 23 SR (NSW) 11 McLean v Burns Philp Trustee Co Pty Ltd (1985) 2 NSWLR 623 Metcalfe v O'Kennedy (2) (1904) 4 SR (NSW) 633 Moran v House (1924) 35 CLR 60 Morgan Equipment Company v Rodgers [No.2] (1993) 32 NSWLR 467 Muller v Marriott (1921) 22 SR (NSW) 100 Murdocca v Murdocca [2002] NSWSC 159 O'Brien v Ritchie (1931) 48 WN (NSW) 85 Patching v Barnett [1907] 2 Ch 154 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Paling (1924) 25 SR (NSW) 56 Perpetual Trustee Company (Limited) v Thomas (1942) 59 WN (NSW) 100 Re Rooke; Jeans v Gatehouse [1933] Ch 970 Robertson v Graham (1917) 17 SR (NSW) 676 Sharp v Lush (1879) 10 Ch D 468 Trustees Executors and Agency Co Ltd v Ramsay (1920) 27 CLR 279 Wallersteiner v Moir [No.2] [1975] 1 QB 373 Watson v Ralph (1982) 148 CLR 646 Wyndham v Mackenzie (1918) 25 CLR 172 DECISION : Interest awarded, at Schedule J Supreme Court rates; Principles appropriate to adversary litigation applied in making costs order; Orders made in paragraph 82 judgment.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate