NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 55 NSWLR 80 (2002) 131 A Crim R 510
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Grant [2002] NSWCCA 243 revised - 30/07/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60460/01 HEARING DATE(S) : Friday 8 February 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 July 2002
PARTIES : Regina Robert John Grant JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Wood CJ at CL at 2; Kirby J at 132
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70042/00 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Hulme J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr Dawe QC with Mr Clout (Crown) Mr Haesler with Mr Wilson (Appellant) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor Western Aboriginal Legal Service CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - murder - appeal against convictions - intoxication - directions given to jury in relation to intoxication - reckless indifference to human life- whether an offence of specific intent under part 11A of Crimes Act - application of the proviso. - CRIMINAL LAW - shooting with intent to murder - appeal against convictions - intoxication - whether verdict unreasonable or could not be supported by the evidence - whether jury should have entertained a reasonable doubt - whether a miscarriage of justice. Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Criminal Code Act 1995 Interpretation Act 1987 Boughey v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 10 Crabbe v The Queen (1985) 156 CLR 464; Director of Public Prosecutions v Beard (1920) AC 479 Fontaine v The Queen (1976) 136 CLR 62; He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 527 Her Majesty's Advocate v Kinnison [1870] 1 Coup 457 Jones v The Queen (1997) 72 ALJR 78 M v The Queen (1993) 181 CLR 487 Mackenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 Pearce v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 610 Pemble v The Queen (1971) 124 CLR 107 Queen v O'Connor (1981) 146 CLR 64. The Queen v Pereira (1988) 35 A Crim R 382 at 385 Regina v Ainsworth (1994) 76 A Crim R 127 Regina v Aiton (1993) 68 A Crim R 578 R v Farrell (1964) NSWLR 1143 R v Hancock [1986] AC 455 Regina v Haywood (1971) VR 755) CASES CITED: Regina v JB and RJH (1999) NSWCCA 93 Regina v Kamipeli, unreported Regina v Keogh (1964) VR 400 Regina v Majewski 1977 AC 443 Regina v Mills NSWCCA, 3 April 1995 R v Moloney (1985) AC 905 R v Martin (1983) 9 A Crim R 376 Regina v Masnec (1962) Tas SR 254 R v Meade [1909] 1 KB 895 R v Morgan (1993) 67 A Crim R 526 R v Peterkin (1982) 6 A Crim R 351 R v Solomon (1980) 1 NSWLR 321 R v Stones (1956) 56 SR (NSW) 25 Regina v Winchester, 1955, Unreported Royall v The Queen (1991) 172 CLR 378; Smyth v The Queen (1957) 98 CLR 163 Stapleton v The Queen (1952) 86 CLR 358 Vallance v The Queen (1961) 35 ALJR 182 Viro v The Queen (1978) 141 CLR 88 Wilson v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 313 DECISION : Appeal against conviction in respect of Count 1 allowed; conviction and sentence for Count 1 quashed. A new trial is directed in relation to Count 1. The appeal against conviction and sentence in respect of Count 2 is dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate