NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lolakis & Anor v Konitsas [2002] NSWSC 889 revised - 25/10/2002 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 4646/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 12/9/02-13/9/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 October 2002
Lucas Lolakis (First Plaintiff) PARTIES : Anna Lolakis (Second Plaintiff) Michael Konitsas (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Campbell J
COUNSEL : M K Rollinson (Plaintiffs) R A Skiller (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Friend & Co (Plaintiffs) Mee Ling (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : REAL PROPERTY - easements - whether purported easement is not really an easement because it confers exclusive possession of servient tenement - effect on validity of easement of transferee's failure to company with covenant contained in instrument granting easement - whether easement obsolete - whether easement impedes reasonable user of servient tenement without securing practical benefit to persons entitled to dominant tenement - whether easement abandoned - significance of criteria for Registrar General to expunge easement by administrative action - whether extinguishment will not substantially injure persons entitled to easement Conveyancing Act 1919 LEGISLATION CITED : Law of Property Act (UK) 1925 Limitations Act 1969 Real Property Act 1900 Application of Magney (1981) 2 BPR 97117 Application of Peter Cardigan Wolfe (1997) 8 BPR 15,669 Bursill Enterprises Pty Ltd v Berger Bros Trading Co Pty Ltd (1971) 124 CLR 73 Cavacourt Pty Ltd v Durian (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1998) 9 BPR 97761 Coles Myer NSW Ltd v Dymocks Book Arcade Ltd (1996) 9 BPR 97767 Copeland v Greenhalf [1952] 1 Ch 488 Durack v De Winton (1998) 9 BPR 97721 Evanel Pty Ltd v Nelson (1995) 39 NSWLR 209 Grigsby v Melville [1972] 1 WLR 1355 Guth v Robinson (1977) 1 BPR Heaton v Loblay (1960) SR (NSW) 332 In Re Ellenborough Park [1956] 1 Ch 131 In Re Ghey and Galton's Application [1957] 2 QB 650 In Re Henderson's Conveyance [1940] Ch 835 In Re Miscamble's Application [1966] VR 596 Metropolitan Railway Co v Fowler [1893] AC 416 CASES CITED : Mogensen v Portuland Developments Pty Ltd (1983) NSW ConvR 55-116 Morpath Pty Ltd v ACT Youth Accommodation Group Inc (1987) 16 FCR 325 Pennant Hills Golf Club Ltd v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales (1999) 9 BPR 97771 Pink v Cummings [2000] NSWSC 1114; (2001) NSW ConvR 55-959 Piper v Edwards [1982] 1 NSWLR 336 Post Investments Pty Ltd v Wilson (1990) 26 NSWLR 598 Proprietors Strata Plan No 9968 v Proprietors Strata Plan No 11173 [1979] 2 NSWLR 605 Re Alexandra [1980] VR 55 at 57-58 Re R K Roseblade and V M Roseblade and the Conveyancing Act [1964-5] NSWR 2044 Reilly v Booth (1890) 44 ChD 12 Roxborough v Rothmans of Pall Mall Australia Limited [2001] HCA 68; (2001) 76 ALJR 203 Stannard v Issa [1987] 1 AC 175 Thomas W Ward, Ltd v Alexander Bruce (Grays) Ltd [1959] 2 Ll R 472 Treweeke v 36 Wolsley Road Pty Ltd (1973) 128 CLR 274 Truman Hanbury, Buxton and Co Limited's Application [1956] 1 QB 261 T Z Developments Pty Ltd v Rickman Pty Ltd (1993) 7 BPR 97582 Webster v Bradac (1993) 5 BPR 97430 Wright v Macadam [1949] 2 KB 744 DECISION : Easement held valid
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate