NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Hoban v Mathieson [No 2] [2002] NSWCA 223 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40722/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 July 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 July 2002
Laurel Jane Hoban PARTIES : v Gail Julia Mathieson JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 6365/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Walmsley DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - S G Campbell Respondent - P Moore Solicitor SOLICITORS : Appellant - Hunt & Hunt Newcastle Respondent - Brazel Moore & Daly Gosford
DECISION : Appeal allowed with costs. Orders made
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
40722/01 DC 6365/01 HANDLEY JA
Wednesday 10 July 2002 LAUREL JANE HOBAN v GAIL JULIA MATHIESON ORDERS HIS HONOUR:
(1) Appeal allowed with costs.
(2) Judgment for the plaintiff for $155,500 with costs set aside and in lieu thereof substitute a judgment for $26,840 with effect from 12 September 2001 and the following orders as to costs pursuant to Pt 39A r 25(6) of the District Court Rules: (a) The defendant to pay the plaintiff's costs to and including 23 January 2001; and (b) The plaintiff to pay the defendant's costs thereafter.
(3) Judgment for the appellant in the sum of $139,349.03 including interest of $10,689.03 pursuant to s 94 of the Supreme Court Act 1970 from 17 October 2001 to 10 July 2002 by way of restitution for overpayment made pursuant to the former judgment of the District Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate