NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Texcrete Pty Limited v Khavin & 1 Ors [2003] NSWCA 337 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 September 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 19 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA at 1; McColl JA at 86; Foster AJA at 87 DECISION : (1) Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed; (2) Appellant to pay the costs of the first and second respondents.
CATCHWORDS : BREACH OF STATUTORY DUTY - s27 Factories, Shops & Industries Act 1962 - failure to fence a dangerous machine. - NEGLIGENCE - duty of care of appellant occupier, to the extent it existed, to the first respondent employee was not breached - second respondent employer not liable in negligence to the first respondent employee. - DAMAGES - discretionary. Factories, Shops & Industries Act 1962; s27 LEGISLATION CITED : Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1946; s5(1)(c) Workers Compensation Act 1987 (NSW); s151Z(2) Azar v Dairy Farmers Co-operative Ltd (1989) 15 NSWLR 651 Bankstown Foundry Pty Limited v Braistina (1986) 160 CLR 301 Connecticut Fire Insurance Co v Kavanagh [1892] AC 473 Dairy Farmers Co-op Ltd v Azar (1990) 170 CLR 293 Dunlop Rubber Australia Limited v Buckley (1952) 87 CLR 313 Forest v John Mills Himself Pty Ltd (1970) 121 CLR 149 Liftronic Pty Ltd v Unver (2001) 179 ALR 321 Mitchell v North British Rubber Co Ltd (1945) SC(JC) 69 O'Connor v Commissioner for Government Transport (1954) 100 CLR 225 CASES CITED : Ross v WGE Pty Limited (1998) 44 NSWLR 510 Shedlezki v Bronte Bakery Pty Ltd (1972) SR(NSW) 378 Sherman v Nymboida Collieries Pty Ltd (1963) 109 CLR 580 Smithwick v National Coal Board (1950) 2 KB 335 Sovar v Henry Lane Pty Ltd (1967) 116 CLR 397 State of New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 77 ALJR 558 Sutter v Gundowda Pty Limited (1915) 81 CLR 418 Twynam Pastoral Company Pty Limited v Bennett [2002] NSWCA 319 Van der Sluice v Display Craft Pty Limited (2002) NSWCA 404 Whisprun v Dixon (2003) 77 AJLR 1598 TEXCRETE PTY LIMITED (Appellant) PARTIES : Boris KHAVIN (First Respondent) ABB INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS PTY LIMITED (Second Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40259/03 G M Watson, SC/ Ms T L Wong (Appellant) COUNSEL : M J Slattery, SC/ P J Doherty (First Respondent) C R R Hoeben, SC/ D G Saul (Second Respondent) Henry Davis York (Appellant) SOLICITORS : Boyd House & Partners (First Respondent) Leitch Hasson Dent (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate