NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 136 A Crim R 206
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Ismunandar and Siregar [2002] NSWCCA 477 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60122/01; 60082/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 10 December 2001 11 December 2001 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 December 2002
PARTIES : Regina v Sidiki Ismunandar Regina v Saud Siregar JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA; Sully J; Levine J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/11/0375; 99/11/0371 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Shadbolt DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : E. Fullerton SC - Crown D. Dalton - Appellants Commonwealth DPP SOLICITORS : Freeman Solicitors - Ismunandar George Sten & Co - Siregar CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - sentence - massive heroin importation - one of five co-ffenders appeals against sentence and is dealt with separately - two other co-offenders claim a reduction in their sentences by reason of parity. - Held : no reduction justified R v Chen [2002] NSWCCA 174 R v Mandagi [2002] NSWCCA 57 R v Diamond (NSWCCA, unreported, 18/2/93] CASES CITED: Lowe v R (1984) 154 CLR 606 R v Gallagher (1991) 53 A Crim R 248 Postiglione v R (1997) 189 CLR 295 R v Rexhaj (NSWCCA, unreported, 29/2/96) DECISION : Appeals against sentence granted; appeals dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60122 OF 2001 60082 OF 2001
HEYDON JA SULLY J LEVINE J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate