NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : BHAGAT v GLOBAL CUSTODIANS LIMITED [2002] NSWCA 160 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40769/00; 40770/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 7 May 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 May 2002
Hari Bhagat (Appellant) Global Custodians Limited (First Respondent) PARTIES : John Healey Speight (Second Respondent) Jessee Barrie Marr Speight (Third Respondent) Archie Greenlees (Fourth Respondent) Norma Patricia Greenlees (Fifth Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Ipp AJA at 53; Brownie AJA at 56
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT SC 2539/98; 3156/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Justice Young JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : In Person (Appellant) G C Lindsay SC (Respondents) SOLICITORS : In Person (Appellant) Holding Redlich (Respondents) CATCHWORDS : CONTEMPT OF COURT - whether improper pressure applied to a party to withdraw from proceedings - where threatening letter sent to persons consenting to be joined as plaintiffs - where letter marked 'without prejudice' - whether letter admissible - whether communication between persons 'in dispute' - Evidence Act 1995, s131. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Supreme Court Act 1970 AMIEU v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd (1986) 161 CLR 98 Attorney-General v Hislop [1991] 1 QB 514 Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273 Coles Myer Limited v O'Brien (1992) 28 NSWLR 525 CASES CITED: Global Custodians Limited v Mesh [1999] NSWSC 624 Harkianakis v Skalkos (1997) 42 NSWLR 22 Hinch v Attorney-General (Vic) (1987) 164 CLR 15 Resolute Limited v Warnes [2000] WASCA 359 Vajda v Nine Network Australia Limited [2000] NSWSC 873 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 DECISION : Appeals dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate