NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Michael TAYLOR [2003] NSWCCA 194 HEARING DATE(S) : 7/7/03 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 November 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Bell J at 2; Miles AJ at 183 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed; Grant leave to appeal against the sentence, but dismiss the appeal
CATCHWORDS : EVIDENCE - unfavourable witness - whether leave should be granted pursuant to s 38 of the Evidence Act in a case in which the witness does not recall the circumstances of making a statement to the police. EVIDENCE - admissibility of solicitor's file note containing instructions from a client as a business record under s 69(2) of the Evidence Act - The exercise of the s 135 discretion to exclude evidence tendered on behalf of an accused in criminal proceedings. CRIMINAL LAW- when proceedings for an offence are instituted for the purposes of the Crimes Self-Defence Amendment Act 2001. Whether re-arraignment on an indictment in all material respects the same as an earlier indictment amounts to the substitution of an indictment for s 20 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Amendment Self-Defence Act 2001 (NSW) Criminal Appeal Rules 1952 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Legislation Amendment (Sentencing) Act 1999 (NSW) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Director of Public Prosecutions Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) Adam v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 96 M v The Queen (1984) 181 CLR 487 Mackay v The Queen (1977) 136 CLR 465 Papakosmas v the Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Power v The Queen (1973) 131 CLR 623 Regina v Esposito (1998) 45 NSWLR 442 Regina v Fowler [2000] NSWCCA 142 Regina v Glasby (2000) 115 A Crim R 465 CASES CITED : R v Howard (1992) 29 NSWLR 242 R v Lockyer (1996) 89 A Crim R 547 Regina v Kneebone [1999] 47 NSWLR 450 Regina v Lozano (unreported) NSWCCA, 10 June 1997 R v Sepulveda [2003] NSWCCA 131 Regina v Simpson [2001] NSWCCA 534 Regina v Souleyman (1996) 40 NSWLR 712 Regina v Yates [2002] NSWCCA 520 Zecevic v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) (1987) 162 CLR 645 PARTIES : Michael Taylor (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60098/03 COUNSEL : G Nicholson QC (Appellant) R Hulme SC (Respondent) SOLICITORS : DJ Humphreys (Appellant) SE O'Connor (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate