NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Argyropoulos v Layton & Anor [2002] NSWCA 183 revised - 21/06/2002 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40646/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 March 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 June 2002
PARTIES : Vasilios ARGYROPOULOS (Appellant) Nicholas Guy LAYTON & Steven John BURNS (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Handley JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 11; Santow JA at 14
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC 4171/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Cripps ADJC JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : M R Aldridge, SC/ M W Anderson (Appellant) G M Gregg (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Maxwell Berghouse & Ives (Appellant) Corrs Chamber Westgarth (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : TORT - professional negligence - respondent failed to commence proceedings in prescribed time and failed to seek leave to commence proceedings out of time - whether more than one cause of action - continuing duty - CONTRACT - breach of duty under retainer - DAMAGES - general principle - discretion to discount award for the possibility that leave to commence out of time may have failed. LEGISLATION CITED : Motor Accidents Act 1988 s52(4) Bell v Brown [1990] 2 QB 495 Carter v Egg Pulp Marketing Board (1942) 66 CLR 557 Cartledge v Jopling & Sons Ltd [1963] AC 758 Cassis v Kalfus [2001] NSWCA 460 Damberg v Damberg and others (2002) 52 NSWLR 493 Doundoulakis v Antony Sdrinis & Co [1989] VR 781 Dunlop v McGowans 1979 SC 22; 1980 SC(HL) 73 Flower & Hart v White Industries (Qld) Pty Limited [201] 109 FCR 280 (full court) Harris v Raggatt [1965] VR 779 Hawkins v Clayton (1986) 5 NSWLR 109; (reversed by the High Court (1988) 164 CLR 539) Hetherington v Mirvac Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 443; (1999) Aust Torts Reports 81-514 at 66-022 - 66-023 Howell v Young (1826) 5 B & C 259 [108 ER 97] Larking v Great Western (Nepean) Gravel Ltd (1940) 64 CLR 221 CASES CITED: Letang v Cooper [1965] 1 QB 232 Marshall v London Passenger Transport Board [1936] 3 All ER 83 Patterson v Richards [1963] VR 179 Read v Brown (1888) 22 QBD 128 Republic of India v India Steamship Co Ltd [1993] 410 Sampson v Zucker (NSWSC, CA, 11 December 1996, unreported) Scarcella v Lettice (2000) 51 NSWLR 302 Scott v Echegaray (1991) Aust Torts Reports 81-120 Sheldon v McBeath (1993) ATPR 81-209 Smith v Wilkins and Davies Construction [1958] NZLR 958 Vulic v Bilinsky [1983] 2 NSWLR 472 Wardley Australia Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 Williams v Milotin (1957) 97 CLR 465 Wilson v Rigg (Sperling J, [2000] NSWSC 16, 7 February 2000, unreported) DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed and orders in court below set aside; 2. Judgment for the Appellant in the sum of $10,251.28 with effect from 24 July 2000; 3. Respondents to pay Appellant's costs of the proceedings in the court below; 4. Respondent to pay Appellant's costs of the appeal and to have a suitor's fund certificate if otherwise entitled.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate