NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : WILLS v PETROULIAS [2003] NSWCA 390 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 December 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 22 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Handley JA at 74; Santow JA at 75 DECISION : Application granted. Orders of 3 October 2003 vacated and substituted.
CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Defrauding the Commonwealth - Element of loss - Whether evidence thereof - CRIMINAL PROCEDURE - Appeal from committal - Where evidence presented in summary form - Exercise of discretion on appeal - Whether charge should be settled by magistrate Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 29D LEGISLATION CITED : Justices Act 1902 ss 41, 41A, 104, 109, 110 Supreme Court Act 1970 s 76 Essenbourne Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1577 Kolalich v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1991) 173 CLR 222 Petroulias v Wills [2002] NSWSC 1190 CASES CITED : Petroulias v Wills [2003] NSWSC 106 R v Taylor (1997) 6 Tas R 310 The Queen v Kastratovic (1986) 42 SASR 59 Walstern v Commissioner of Taxation [2003] FCA 1428 Wills v Petroulias [2003] NSWCA 286 Nikytas Nicholas Petroulias PARTIES : (Applicant/Opponent) Gary Andrew Wills (Respondent/Claimant) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40219/03 COUNSEL : N Clelland SC (Applicant/Opponent) P Hastings QC (Respondent/Claimant) SOLICITORS : Coadys (Applicant/Opponent) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent/Claimant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate