NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : JONSTAN PTY LIMITED & ORS v NICHOLSON & ORS [2002] NSWSC 1043 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 20161 of 1998; 11657 of 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 3.12.01-10.12.01 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 November 2002
Plaintiffs: Jonstan Pty Ltd; Nelarc Pty Ltd; Prefix Pty Ltd; William Dixon Suthers; John James Wiley PARTIES : Defendants: Glenn William Nicholson; Robert William Norman; Gerrard John Sturgess; Stan Reilly; John Cummingham; Michael J Perkins t/as Hooton & Perkins; Cross Defendants: Jonstan Pty Ltd; Nelarc Pty Ltd; Prefix Pty Ltd; William Dixon Suthers; John James Wiley; Michael J Perkins; George Pashalis; Hunt Pacific Finance Pty Ltd; Stan Reilly; John Cummingham JUDGMENT OF : Hulme J at 1
Plaintiffs: P Taylor SC with J White COUNSEL : Defendants: F Corsaro SC with I Roberts R Darke SC with P Glissan SOLICITORS : CATCHWORDS : Negligence - misleading and deceptive conduct - solicitors - finance brokers LEGISLATION CITED : Fair Trading Act; DECISION : Orders deferred.
- 68 - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HULME J Friday, 8 November 2002.
11657/99 & 20161/98 JONSTAN PTY LIMITED & 4 ORS v GLENN NICHOLSON & 5 ORS – 20161/98 JONSTAN PTY LIMITED AND 5 ORS v HUNT PACIFIC FINANCE PTY LIMITED - 11657/99
JUDGMENT 1 HIS HONOUR: These Reasons for Judgment are divided up into the following sections: Introduction paragraph 2 The Plaintiffs' Involvement paragraph 10 Events 28 July to 20 August 1997 paragraph 22 Events prior to 28 July 1997 paragraph 53 Mr Reilly paragraph 93 Other Evidence paragraph 101 Conclusions Hooton & Perkins paragraph 109 Mr Cunningham paragraph 129 Hunt paragraph 145 Mr Reilly paragraph 167 Cross-Claims and Contribution paragraph 177 Extent of Loss paragraph 189 Other Matters paragraph 195
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate