NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Wentworth v Graham & 1 Ors [2003] NSWCA 88 HEARING DATE(S) : letter dated 13 March 2003, submissions dated 14 March 2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 April 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Santow JA DECISION : I dismiss Ms Wentworth's application that I withdraw or amend my judgment of 10 December 2002.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application to withdraw judgment - whether judgment proceeded on a misapprehension of fact or law - whether any misapprehension warranting the exceptional step of setting aside or amending the judgment LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Rules Pt 20 r 9; Pt 42 r 12 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 De L v Director General, New South Wales Department of Community Services (No 2) (1997) 190 CLR 207 CASES CITED : Smith v New South Wales Bar Association (No 2) (1992) 176 CLR 256 State Rail Authority of New South Wales v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (No 2) (1982) 150 CLR 29 Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council & Ors (No 2) (1982) 149 CLR 672 Katherine Wentworth (Applicant) PARTIES : Geoffrey Graham (First Respondent) William Charles Wentworth (Second Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40277/00 COUNSEL : Ms Wentworth (in writing) SOLICITORS :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40277/00
SANTOW JA
17 APRIL 2003 Katherine WENTWORTH -v- Geoffrey GRAHAM & 1 Ors Judgment 1 SANTOW JA:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate