NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Lucy v Lomas [2002] NSWSC 448 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2144/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 22, 23 April 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 April 2002
David Robert Lucy (as Executor of the Estate of the late Robert Lucy) (P) Brenda Lomas (D1) PARTIES : Prescribing Biochemists Pty Ltd (D2) Manucom Pty Ltd (D3) The College of Somatic Studies Pty Ltd (D4) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
COUNSEL : K Smark and M Sneddon (P) R D Marshall (D) SOLICITORS : Schweizer & Co (P) Paul Nass (D) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS [29]- Oppression- Merely being in a minority and suffering prejudice because of that insufficient to constitute oppression. LEGISLATION CITED : Corporations Act, ss 232, 233, 234(d) Elder v Elder & Watson Ltd [1952] SC 49 Fexuto v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (1998) 28 ACSR 688 John J Starr (Real Estate) Pty Ltd v Robert R Andrew (Australasia) Pty Ltd (1991) 6 ACSR 63 McWilliam v LJR McWilliam Estates Pty Ltd (1990) 2 ACSR 757 Profinance Trust SA v Gladstone [2002] 1 BCLC 141 Re A Company; ex parte Harries [1989] BCLC 383 CASES CITED : Re Broadcasting Station 2GB Pty Ltd [1964-5] NSWR 1648 Re G Jeffrey (Mens Store) Pty Ltd (1984) 9 ACLR 193 Re H R Harmer Ltd [1959] 1 WLR 62 Re Jermyn Street Turkish Baths [1971] 1 WLR 1042 Re M Dalley & Co Pty Ltd (1968) 1 ACLR 489 Roberts v Walter Developments Pty Ltd (1992) 10 ACLC 804 Thomas v H W Thomas Ltd (1984) 2 ACLC 610 Wayde v NSW Rugby League Ltd (1985)180 CLR 459 DECISION : Proceedings dismissed with costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate