NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : CSR Limited v. Clydesdale [2003] NSWCA 363 HEARING DATE(S) : Matter dealt with in Chambers JUDGMENT DATE : 11 December 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 1; Foster AJA at 1 DECISION : 1. Orders 1 and 2 made 21 November 2003 vacated. 2. Appeal allowed to the extent of substituting for the amount awarded to the respondent judgment in the sum of $974,240.70. 3. Respondent to pay appellant's costs of the appeal up to 11am on 21 May 2003, and to have a certificate under the Suitors' Fund Act if otherwise eligible. 4. Appellant to pay respondent's costs of the appeal from 11am on 21 May 2003 on an indemnity basis.
CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE - APPEAL - COSTS - Offer of compromise by plaintiff respondent - Greater than amount of substituted verdict, but less than verdict plus interest at time of offer - Costs awarded to respondent. PARTIES : CSR Limited - appellant Kim Clydesdale - respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 41006/02 COUNSEL : Mr. J.D. Hislop QC with Mr. G. Seib for appellant Mr. P. Hennessy SC with Ms. M. Kumar for respondent SOLICITORS : Johnstone Robinson Legal, Sydney for appellant Farrell Lusher, Wagga Wagga for respondent
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC 52/01 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Goldring DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 41006/02 DC 52/01
MEAGHER JA HODGSON JA FOSTER JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate