NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 133 A Crim R 206
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v. VINCENT [2002] NSWCCA 369 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60104/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 6 September 2002
PARTIES : Regina - respondent Benjamin Michael Vincent - appellant JUDGMENT OF : Hodgson JA at 1; Simpson J at 59; Smart AJ at 60
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/11/0881 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Dodd DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr. A. Haesler with Mr. D. Weir for appellant Mr. G. Rowling for Crown SOLICITORS : D.J. Humphreys for appellant S.E. O'Connor for Crown CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - Hearsay - Whether admissible - Whether unreliability warning required - Lies - Whether relied on only as to credibility - Whether directions adequate. LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act ss.59, 62, 65, 165 Bromley v. The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 315 Champion (1992) 64 ACrimR 244 Edwards v. The Queen (1997) 178 CLR 193 House v. The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 M v. The Queen (1993) 181 CLR 487 Osland v. The Queen (1998) 197 CLR 316 R v. Baartman [2000] NSWCCA 298 CASES CITED: R v. Fahda [1999] NSWCCA 267 R v. Henry (1999) 49 NSWLR 346 R v. Hodge [2002] NSWCCA 10 R v. Nemeth [2002] NSWCCA 281 R v. Oveido-Portela NSWCCA 17/12/93 R v. Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v. Stewart (2001) 52 NSWLR 301 R v. TJF (2001) 120 ACrimR 209 Zoneff v. The Queen (2000) 200 CLR 234 DECISION : Appeal againt conviction dismissed.; Leave to appeal against sentence refused.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate