NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Cook v McColl [2002] NSWSC 1014 FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 10575/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 14/03/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 October 2002
PARTIES : Plaintiff - Lee Cook Defendant - Darren McColl JUDGMENT OF : Dowd J
LOWER COURT Local Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT U9101 17/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Prowse M JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Plaintiff - Mr Michael O'Brien Defendant - Mr Keith Chapple SOLICITORS : Plaintiff - Crown Solicitor Defendant - Bruce Coode CATCHWORDS : Application to exclude evidence - Admissions alleged unfair to defendant - Voluntary admissions Evidence Act 1995 LEGISLATION CITED : Justices Act 1902 Stock Medicines Act 1989 Suitors' Fund Act 1951 Collins v R (1980) 31 ALR 257 (Full Fed Court) McDermott v The King (1948) 76 CLR 501 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 CASES CITED : Pearce v R [1998] 194 CLR 610 R v Lee (1950) 82 CLR 133 R v Mordy SCNSW (unreported, August 1996) R v Swaffield, Pavic v The Queen (1998) 192 CLR 159 DECISION : (1) Leave to appeal extended to 14 March 2002 (2) Leave to Appeal granted (3) Appeal allowed (4) The interlocutory order of Prowse M that the admissions made by the defendant not be admitted, be set aside (5) The informations laid be determined according to law (6) The defendant pay the plaintiff's costs (7) Defendant granted certificate under Suitors' Fund Act 1951.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate