NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : BEGBIE v. MICHELL [2003] NSWCA 149 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/10/02; 12/12/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 13 June 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 2; Beazley JA at 3 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
CATCHWORDS : Lease - option to purchase - valuation of property - rent capitalisation - existing use rights - Solicitor - whether negligent - Appeal - question of fact - Negligence - causation - 'but for' test Abalos v Australian Postal Commission (1990) 171 CLR 167 CASES CITED : March v Stramare (1991) 171 CLR 506 Barnes & Ors. v Hay (1988) 12 NSWLR 337 Stansbie v Troman [1984] 2 KB 48 PARTIES : Philip Begbie (Appellant) Michael Michell (Respondent) FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40092/02 COUNSEL : W.H. Nicholas QC/M. T. McCulloch (Appellant) G. Sirtes (Respondent) SOLICITORS : David Geddes (Appellant) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Respondent)
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT DC6552/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Patten DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40092/02
MEAGHER JA HANDLEY JA BEAZLEY JA
13 June 2003 BEGBIE v. MICHELL
FACTS
A lease of premises, which had existing use rights as a veterinary clinic, also included an option to purchase. The lessee exercised the option. As the lessor and lessee could not agree on a purchase price, a valuation clause in the lease was invoked. Only one of the three valuers used a rent capitalisation basis to value the property.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate