NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court
CITATION : Callahan v O'Neill [2002] NSWSC 877 CURRENT JURISDICTION: Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 2137/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 19, 20 September 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 September 2002
PARTIES : Christine Linda Callahan (P) Elizabeth Anne O'Neill (D) JUDGMENT OF : Young CJ in Eq
COUNSEL : V R W Gray and J Castaldi (P) S D Robb QC and J Bartos (D) SOLICITORS : Wood Marshall Williams (P) Balmain Lawyers (D) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS [35]- Contract by informal conversations- Considerations. REAL PROPERTY [308]- Partition or sale- Defence- Contract to develop property- On facts defence succeeds. LEGISLATION CITED : Conveyancing Act 1919 s 66G Bradford v Zahra [1977] Qd R 24 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Bathurst CC (2001) 53 NSWLR 153 Fincke v United States 675 F (2d) 289 (1982) Integrated Computer Services Pty Ltd v Digital Equipment Corp (Aust) Pty Ltd (1988) 5 BPR 11,110 Ngatoa v Ford (1990) 19 NSWLR 72 CASES CITED : Macaulay v Greater Paramount Theatres Ltd (1921) 22 SR (NSW) 66 Mackay v Dick (1881) 6 App Cas 251 Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353 Pagnan SpA v Feed Products Ltd [1987] 2 Ll Rep 601 Re McNamara (1961) 78 WN (NSW) 1068 Williams v Legg (1993) 29 NSWLR 687 Woodson (Sales) Pty Ltd v Woodson (Aust) Pty Ltd (1996) 7 BPR 14,685 DECISION : Proceedings should be dismissed with costs. The cross claim should be dismissed with no order as to costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate