NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : State of New South Wales v. Gee (aka Michaels) [2002] NSWCA 326 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40066/02 HEARING DATE(S) : 27 August 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 September 2002
PARTIES : State of New South Wales - appellant Brett Douglas Gee (also known as Michaels) - respondent JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Hodgson JA at 4; Young CJ in Eq at 42
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Common Law Division LOWER COURT SC20223/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Grove J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr. J.D. Hislop QC with Mr. P.R. Sternberg for appellant Mr. D.A. Wheelahan QC with Mr. G.M. Radburn for respondent SOLICITORS : I.V. Knight, Crown Solicitor for appellant Walter, Solicitors, Lismore for respondent CATCHWORDS : DAMAGES - Frontal lobe epilepsy causing blackouts and aggressiveness - Residual earning capacity assessed at 35% of uninjured capacity, itself assessed as being a capacity to earn average weekly earnings - Whether defendant liable for whole 65% difference, with 15% allowance for vicissitudes. CASES CITED: Rosniak v. Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed. 2. Judgment for the respondent against the appellant in the sum of $616,918.00, in lieu of the sum of $826,023.00 awarded by the primary judge. 3. Respondent to pay the appellant's costs of the appeal, and to have a suitors' fund certificate if otherwise entitled.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40066/02 SC 20223/00
GILES JA HODGSON JA YOUNG CJ in Eq
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate