NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : NSW Sugar Milling Co-Operative Ltd v Murray Norman Fowke [2002] NSWCA 229 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40636/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 July 2002 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 July 2002
PARTIES : NSW Sugar Milling Co-Operative Ltd (Claimant) Murray Norman Fowke (Opponent) JUDGMENT OF : Heydon JA at 28-29; 31; Foster AJA at 30; Bergin J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 8574/00 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Certoma ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : P Webb QC leading M J Gollan (Claimant) K W Andrews (Opponent) SOLICITORS : Dexter Healey Kalpage & Co CATCHWORDS : [LEAVE TO APPEAL] - Application for leave to appeal from District Court decision extending the limitation period under s 60G of the Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) - Whether primary judge failed to give adequate weight to the prejudice occasioned to the claimant - Whether primary judge misstated and misapplied the principles applicable to onus of proof. LEGISLATION CITED : Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 CASES CITED: CSR Limited & NSW Sugar Milling Co-Op Ltd v Rendell; NSW Sugar Milling Co-Op v Rendell (NSWCA, unreported, 7 August 1996, Handley, Sheller and Cole JJA) Holt v Wynter (2000) 49 NSWLR 128 DECISION : Summons dismissed with costs.
- 1 -IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES Court of appeal
Heydon JA, Foster AJA, Bergin J 11 JULY 2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate