NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Sinanovic v Regina [2002] NSWCCA 292 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60330/01 HEARING DATE(S) : 8/3/02 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 July 2002
PARTIES : Hakija Sinanovic v Regina JUDGMENT OF : Stein JA at 1; O'Keefe J at 2; Buddin J at 35
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 01/11/0025 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Luland DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr G Nicholson QC - Appellant Mr G Smith - Crown Dean & Co, SOLICITORS : Melbourne Vic - Appellant S E O'Connor, Crown Solicitors, Sydney - Crown CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - Appeal against sentence - Fraudulent misappropriation - Form of indictment - Names of persons to whom payments are to be made not included in indictment - Accused aware of the essence of matters alleged against him - Essential factual ingredients of the offence included in indictment together with sufficient particularity to enable accused to be reasonably apprised of charge - Non inclusion of names not fatal to validity of indictment - Desirability of including in indictment names of persons to whom payments are to be made LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act 1900 s.178A Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s.6 Andrews v The Queen (1968) 126 CLR 198 Council of the City of Shoalhaven v State Pollution Control Commission (1991) 52 A Crim R 291 Wilde v Regina (1998) 164 CLR 365 CASES CITED: Regina v Giri [2001] NSWCCA 197 unreported 12 June 2001 Cheng v The Queen (2000) 208 CLR 248 McQueeney (1989) 39 A Crim R 58 Spies (2000) 113 A Crim R 448 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate