NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v CARTER [2003] NSWCCA 243 HEARING DATE(S) : 01/09/2003 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 September 2003
JUDGMENT OF : Ipp JA at 24; Dunford J at 1; Greg James J at 25 DECISION : Appeal against conviction dismissed. Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal dismissed.
CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law and Practice - drugs - ongoing supply for financial or material reward - whether evidence that accused received the financial reward on one of the occasions - whether reasonable inference. - Criminal Law - sentencing - special circumstances - longer non parole period to facilitate rehabilitation - need to show that if such a longer period is allowed, rehabilitation will probably be successful. LEGISLATION CITED : Drugs Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 s 25A (1) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s44 PARTIES : Regina (Respondent) Susan Diane Carter (Appellant) FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60211/03 COUNSEL : P Miller - Respondent H Cox - Appellant SOLICITORS : SE O'Connor - Respondent DJ Humphreys - Appellant
LOWER COURT District Court JURISDICTION : LOWER COURT 01/51/0199 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Patten DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
- 1 - IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 060211/03
IPP JA DUNFORD J GREG JAMES J
MONDAY 1 SEPTEMBER 2003 R v SUSAN DIANE CARTER Judgment 1 DUNFORD J: This is an appeal by Susan Diane Carter against her conviction on one count of ongoing supply of prohibited drug contrary to s 25A (1) of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, and an application for leave to appeal against the sentence imposed upon her following such conviction. The s 25A (1) is as follows: "A person who, on 3 or more separate occasions during any period of 30 consecutive days, supplies a prohibited drug (other than cannabis) for financial or material reward is guilty of an offence. Maximum penalty: 3,500 penalty units or imprisonment for 20 years, or both"
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate